The Bauhaus can’t be explained,” wrote the artist Jean Leppien. “The
Bauhaus was mainly a way of thinking, a community of 150 individualists
united in a common crusade against existing and accepted values and
prejudices.” Wolfgang Sattler, Professor for Product Design at today’s
Bauhaus University Weimar says: “Everyone creates their own Bauhaus,
invents it as their own rocket to the future. But this rocket is
propelled almost entirely by its own momentum.”
In 2009
the Bauhaus is celebrating its 90th anniversary. Exhibitions in Weimar,
Dessau, Berlin and New York City recall the extremely influential, and
in its day fiercely disputed institution which made decisive
contributions to the worldwide spread of modern innovation in
architecture, art and design. Ninety years is a curious space of time.
Not as round as “50 Years of Bauhaus”, an exhibition that opened up the
Bauhaus and its ideas to the post-war generation. This was followed by
the first repeat editions of Bauhaus furniture which shape our image of
the Bauhaus to this day. On the other hand, the art school’s original
idea is not yet a hundred years old, so it’s not quite outdated and
finished.
How it all began
Ninety years
ago, the architect Walter Gropius (1883–1969) was appointed as director
of the former grand-ducal fine arts academy of Saxony in Weimar. He
united it with the school of applied arts which had been closed since
1915 and renamed it the State Bauhaus in Weimar. It was founded on 1
April 1919. The Bauhaus Manifesto and the university programme, both
written by Gropius, were published the same month: “The complete
building is the final objective of all the visual arts!” states the
first sentence of the manifesto. It is an emotional text that links up
with expressionist movements: “Architects, sculptors, painters, we must
all turn to the crafts!”
The model for the new school
was to be the medieval lodges associated with cathedral construction,
where craftsmen and artists collaborated to create the great Gothic
cathedral. The model may have been backward-looking, but Gropius’ vision
was unequivocally modern. In his words: “Architects, painters and
sculptors must learn to recognize anew the character of a building as a
whole, as a combination of its many parts. Their work will then be
automatically imbued with the architectonic spirit which it lost in the
wake of salon art.” The linking of art and applied arts and crafts, of
the workshop and the master class in Weimar was revolutionary. The break
with the old concept of the art school, where students had to imitate
the methods of their teachers for endless years and modern artistic work
was based on historical models, was equally revolutionary. The end of
World War I heralded not only the demise of the old political order. The
aesthetic strategies and concepts of the 19th century also became
abruptly outdated.
At almost the same time
as the Bauhaus was founded, the new national assembly was convened in
Weimar. Members of parliament gathered in Weimar to write the new
constitution, out of the way of the revolutionary unrest in Berlin. In
1919 the conflict between a system of revolutionary councils and
parliamentary democracy was settled in favour of a state with a
democratic constitution. Compared with the political skirmishes, the
street fighting and battles at the barricades, the aesthetic debates
that led to the founding of the Bauhaus initially seem harmlessly
apolitical.
But Gropius’ ideas were based on
strategies which had already been discussed and formulated as a
political programme in the Work Council for Art, an association of
architects, artists and journalists: “Art and the people have to join
forces” was the slogan in one of the leaflets the council distributed in
March 1919. “Art should no longer be the luxury of a few, but the
enjoyment and life of the masses. The aim is to unite the arts beneath
the wings of a great architecture.” Gropius began by appointing three
artists as Bauhaus masters: the painter Lyonel Feininger, the sculptor
Gerhard Marcks and the painter and art educator Johannes Itten. They
were later joined by the painters Georg Muche, Paul Klee, Oskar
Schlemmer and Wassily Kandinsky. The Bauhaus took up residence in the
Jugendstil buildings of the art school that were designed by Henry van
de Velde.
A new way to teach art
At
first, teaching at the Bauhaus was not organized in master classes but
in workshops. The “masters of form”, the artists and architects, were
accompanied by “master craftsmen” with qualifications in various trades.
Gradually workshops were developed for metalwork, weaving, ceramics,
furniture, typography and the theatre. The early Weimar years are
regarded as the romantic, almost esoteric phase. In this respect
Johannes Itten made a major contribution.
Together with
Bauhaus master Gertrud Grunow he invented the foundation course, the
key innovation which to this day has continuously influenced the
curricula of art and design schools throughout the world. During these
courses new students received comprehensive instructions in the
foundations of aesthetics and form before specializing in the individual
workshops. However, Itten also used his foundation course to imbue
students with his obscure pseudo-religious Mazdaznan beliefs. Many
students and members of staff turned away from such irrational teaching
content.
This was one of the first examples
of conflict within the school. More were to follow, but meanwhile the
school also extended its profile: Itten was followed by László
Moholy-Nagy who integrated typography and photography into the classes.
In 1923 the Bauhaus staged the first exhibition of work from the courses
and workshops. The Haus am Horn, an unadorned show house with a simple
cubic exterior and functional interior designed by Muche, was regarded
by the majority of people in Weimar as an irritating foreign body. The
painter Oskar Schlemmer headed the Bauhaus theatre and focused on the
movement of humans in space in his Triadic Ballet. In a text about
“House construction and Bauhaus!” he called for a break from the ideal
of crafts: “The crafts of former times are now performed by industry, or
they will be: typified, robust, purpose-designed consumer goods for
physical needs, born out of external necessity.”
Opposition and new beginnings
A
change in direction set in. Gropius now started propagating the idea of
“the unity of art, technology and science”. At the beginning of the
1960s he looked back at those days. After reading a diary of 1923 to
1928 he remarked that 90% of the incredible energy invested by all
participants in this enterprise was devoted to fending off hostilities
at local and national level, and only 10% was left for the actual
creative work.”
But this didn’t stop them: “We didn’t doubt for a
moment in our ability to overcome the opposition.” Despite this, the
Bauhaus met with increasing animosity in Weimar. Each year the state
school had to worry about the approval of its budget. The weakening of
liberal-democratic forces in the Thuringian parliament in favour of
nationalist-reactionary circles forced a change in location. The Bauhaus
in Weimar had to close in 1925. The city of Dessau enabled the move and
sponsored a new building.
The building of the Bauhaus
On
the outskirts of Dessau Walter Gropius designed a steel skeleton
construction with a curtain wall; masters’ houses, a housing area and
further individual buildings followed. After the architect and critic
Julius Posener first visited the Bauhaus building in 1992, he described
his impressions: “Since all of the constructive and spatial aspects are
constantly palpable and understandable, you soon feel at ease; you gain a
sense of belonging and inspiration in this house which, at that time
was seen as a signal, a veritable trumpet blast.”
Whereas the word
Bauhaus had so far been highly charged and had triggered controversy,
the school, now named “University of Design” had its first own premises,
a programmatic building which attracted young people from around the
world to be part of a project for renewal.
Finally, in
1927, Gropius appointed a master for the new architecture department:
the Swiss architect Hannes Meyer who held left-wing socialist views. In
1928 he succeeded Gropius as the Bauhaus director. “The people’s needs
instead of luxury needs!” was the slogan Meyer propagated ahead of the
world economic crisis.
The Hannes Meyer era signalled
professionalization and politicization at the Bauhaus. In 1930 the city
of Dessau dismissed Meyer because of his communist tendencies. His
successor was Ludwig Mies van der Rohe (1886–1969), who had caused a
sensation with his Weissenhof residential complex in Stuttgart in 1927
and the German Pavilion at the 1929 World Exposition in Barcelona. The
architect streamlined the courses, whilst the workshops and their
designs for industry declined in significance and a new emphasis was
given to architectural studies.
The National
Socialist Party enforced the closure of the Bauhaus in Dessau in 1932.
The German Communist Party voted against the closure, the Social
Democratic Party abstained. Mies van der Rohe then moved the Bauhaus to
Berlin. Financial difficulties, but above all repressive measures taken
by the National Socialist state, led to its closure and self-dissolution
in 1933.
Worldwide charisma
Despite
this, teachers such as Moholy-Nagy, Walter Gropius and Mies van der
Rohe, who emigrated to America, as well as many students and graduates,
carried the ideas and teaching concepts out into the world. For a while,
the New Bauhaus then existed in Chicago. After the war the mayor of
Dessau, Fritz Hesse, tried to initiate a Bauhaus revival in its old
location. But the aesthetics of modern art didn’t suit the concept of
the East German government.
In the West the new middle classes
embraced the Bauhaus designs when they reappeared as new editions in the
1970s. However, research has shown that the original Bauhaus was far
more colourful, the forms were far more lively and contradictory than
the select impressions we have today. In 1979 the Bauhaus-Archiv opened
in Berlin containing the largest and most important collection of
objects and documents on Bauhaus history.
“There
is a desire to seek orientation in Bauhaus design,” says Omar Akbar,
director of the Bauhaus Foundation until March 2009. To this day
numerous schools, designers and artists make references to the inventive
laboratory of modern art. They include such diverse people as the
architects Meinhard von Gerkan or Daniel Libeskind.
The
Bauhaus concept shaped by Gropius is ideally suited to absorbing
constantly new ideas and projections. Some of Wolfgang Sattler’s
students at the Bauhaus University in Weimar have dubbed one of their
projects “My Bauhaus is better than yours”. Whereas design, architecture
and art schools have tended to demarcate their subjects since the
1950s, recent trends have been inspiring crossovers with related
disciplines. It’s almost like 90 years ago.
Source: www.germanyandafrica.diplo.de
0 yorum:
Post a Comment